When the Tea Party has a few hundred people meet in a "protest the Kenyan America-hating black guy for president" rally the entire media world is in attendance. FOX does their blow-by-blow coverage. They also host events for the GOP in their off time.

When the largest protest in the history of NYC, and the country, is held to draw attention to climate change, global warming, and what we can do NOW to ensure the future of our planet………NADA, not one word. The ralliers made sure Wall Street heard it, too. And this was a protest heard around the globe….NOT just in this country. 

"Cable news, with the
 exception of Al Jazeera America, mostly looked the other way, besides a couple of segments on CNN and MSNBC."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/22/peoples-climate-march-media-coverage_n_5860502.html

A look at NBC's website revealed….nothing. Same with CBS. CNN had this blurb along the side: 

• Florida loud music case back to trial
• Climate activists take on Wall Street
• New video of WH fence-jumper 

Leave it to Al Jazeera (that evil old Arab-sounding site…) to have an entire article: 

"Protesters 'sound the climate alarm' in global marches

Tens of thousands in noisy march through the streets of New York City to call for carbon-free future ahead of UN summit " http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/9/21/climate-march-nyc.html

The Koch Brothers are doing their best, I'm sure, to make sure that this "little incident" gets no coverage….but probably a lot of arrests, if they can manage it. But how can you subdue the entire world?? Do they have that much money?? At least the Rockefeller Foundation along with some others, are divesting from fossil fuels and going for other alternative energy sources. (I know, it will barely make a dent in their portfolio, but it's the thought.)

I know there are those on the Right that believe everything is God's will (and the Christian God only)…..but I believe God gave us brains and sense of stewardship to figure out out to protect this planet. He didn't make us all idiots. Of course, intelligent people can also research for themselves.

         http://climate.nasa.gov    or   http://climate.nasa.gov/evidence/

Does This Look Like A Fish To You???

This graph, lifted from the report (on the x-axis, -1 is liberal and 1 is conservative), shows the damage the wrong messaging can do: With no messaging, roughly 60 percent of all participants picked the CFL; a pro-environment message boosted support in liberals but cut it sharply in conservatives.@Grist.org

"In other words, in “territorial defense” of their climate change denying political agenda, conservatives are less likely to use a product if it’s labeled as energy-saving, making the perverse point that, either “we don’t need no stinking energy-saving stuff because we’ve got our denial party-line to rely on,” OR “our stance is right, yours is wrong; we’re definitely NOT buying into yours, so we will not be buying these damn efficiency light bulbs, thank you.”

Read more at Addicting Info: http://tinyurl.com/k9ker7v

 Too bad it has to be one way or the other: